At 1440p, R9 FURY X can hit 50-60 fps on pretty much everything at ultra, just without antialiasing, less ambient occlusion and turned down shadows. It is worth noting that the R9 FURY X is a very power hungry card and requires a decent power supply unit. With regards to max load temperature, the R9 FURY X 's cooling is excellent at keeping it cool and under control. Deciding whether to invest so much money in a high-end GPU like R9 FURY X requires careful thought. With current 4096 MB RAM, the R9 FURY X can have very few memory-related bottlenecks in more modern games.
The R9 FURY X is much more expensive than the R9 390 as it costs a whopping 0. Compare this to the R9 390, AMD Radeon R9 390X, which came originally at a price of 0, 0. Meanwhile, the NVIDIA closest equivalent card is the GTX 980 which costs 0. Spec for spec, this R9 FURY X leapfrogs its direct predecessor, the R9 390, by boasting 30.9 % more fps.
Compared to its NVIDIA 's closest rival, GTX 980, the R9 FURY X was 5.8 % faster. Fortunately, gaming performance was quite impressive. The R9 FURY X consistently delivers great frame rate increases over the R9 390, AMD Radeon R9 390X and it really justifies an upgrade.
For 1080p Full HD, we were able to play Battlefield 2042, Gears of War 5, Far Cry 6, Resident Evil 4, Monster Hunter: World at 60 fps to 65 fps and kept frame rates hovering around 62 fps. For 1440p Quad HD, we were able to play Apex Legends, Resident Evil 2, Call of Duty Modern Warfare, Overwatch 2, Strange Brigade at 60 fps to 68 fps and kept frame rates hovering around 65 fps.
For 2160p 4K, we were able to play Valorant at 108 fps to 108 fps and kept frame rates hovering around 108 fps.
The R9 FURY X sits between the GTX 980 Ti and the RX 590, falling slower than GTX 980 Ti by 1.7% and faster than RX 590 by 0.9%. It has a strong relative performance against every graphics card here. Its results are actually indistinguishable from those of the GTX 980 Ti. It is a close call between the R9 FURY X and its rival GTX 980 by a small margin. In addition, the R9 FURY X was also faster than the R9 390 by a good margin.
| Year | Graphics Card | Price | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 | 0 |
|
| 2017 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | 0 |
|
| 2015 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X | 0 |
|
| 2016 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 | 0 |
|
| 2015 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti | 0 |
|
| 2017 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | 0 |
|
| 2017 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 | 0 |
|
| 2018 | AMD Radeon RX 590 | 0 |
|
| 2014 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 | 0 |
|
| 2016 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB | 0 |
|
| 2017 | AMD Radeon RX 580 | 0 |
|
| 2015 | AMD Radeon R9 FURY X | 0 |
|
| 2016 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | 0 |
|
| 2014 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 | 0 |
|
| 2015 | AMD Radeon R9 Nano | 0 |
|
| 2015 | AMD Radeon R9 390X | 0 |
|
| 2013 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN | 0 |
|
| 2013 | AMD Radeon R9 290 | 0 |
|
| 2015 | AMD Radeon R9 390 | 0 |
|
| 2017 | AMD Radeon RX 570 | 0 |
|
| 2016 | AMD Radeon RX 470 | 0 |
|
| 2013 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti | 0 |
|
| 2013 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 | 0 |
|
| 2015 | AMD Radeon R9 380X | 0 |
|
| 2015 | AMD Radeon R9 380 | 0 |
|
| 2016 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | 0 |
|
| 2013 | AMD Radeon R9 290X | 0 |
|
| 2012 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 | 0 |
|
| 2012 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 | 0 |
|
| 2014 | AMD Radeon R9 285 | 0 |
|
| 2013 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 | 0 |
|
The R9 FURY X sits between the RX 580 and the GTX 1060 3GB, falling slower than RX 580 by 0.3% and faster than GTX 1060 3GB by 2.1%. It has an average relative performance against every graphics card here. Its results are actually indistinguishable from those of the RX 580. In addition, the R9 FURY X was also faster than the R9 390 by a good margin.
The R9 FURY X sits between the GTX 980 Ti and the RX 590, falling slower than GTX 980 Ti by 1.7% and faster than RX 590 by 0.9%. It has a strong relative performance against every graphics card here. Its results are actually indistinguishable from those of the GTX 980 Ti. It is a close call between the R9 FURY X and its rival GTX 980 by a small margin. In addition, the R9 FURY X was also faster than the R9 390 by a good margin.
| Year | Graphics Card | Price | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 | 0 |
|
| 2017 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | 0 |
|
| 2014 | AMD Radeon R9 295X2 | 0 |
|
| 2016 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 | 0 |
|
| 2017 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | 0 |
|
| 2017 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 | 0 |
|
| 2015 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X | 0 |
|
| 2015 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti | 0 |
|
| 2015 | AMD Radeon R9 FURY X | 0 |
|
| 2018 | AMD Radeon RX 590 | 0 |
|
| 2014 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 | 0 |
|
| 2015 | AMD Radeon R9 Nano | 0 |
|
| 2016 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB | 0 |
|
| 2017 | AMD Radeon RX 580 | 0 |
|
| 2016 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | 0 |
|
| 2015 | AMD Radeon R9 390X | 0 |
|
| 2014 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 | 0 |
|
| 2015 | AMD Radeon R9 390 | 0 |
|
| 2013 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN | 0 |
|
| 2013 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 | 0 |
|
| 2013 | AMD Radeon R9 290 | 0 |
|
| 2017 | AMD Radeon RX 570 | 0 |
|
| 2013 | AMD Radeon R9 290X | 0 |
|
| 2016 | AMD Radeon RX 470 | 0 |
|
| 2013 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti | 0 |
|
| 2015 | AMD Radeon R9 380X | 0 |
|
| 2012 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 | 0 |
|
| 2015 | AMD Radeon R9 380 | 0 |
|
| 2012 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 | 0 |
|
| 2014 | AMD Radeon R9 285 | 0 |
|
| 2016 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | 0 |
|
| 2013 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 | 0 |
|
The R9 FURY X sits between the GTX 980 Ti and the RX 590, falling slower than GTX 980 Ti by 14.3% and faster than RX 590 by 5.4%. It has an average relative performance against every graphics card here. It is a close call between the R9 FURY X and its rival GTX 980 by a small margin. In addition, the R9 FURY X was also faster than the R9 390 by a good margin.
The R9 FURY X sits between the GTX 980 Ti and the RX 590, falling slower than GTX 980 Ti by 1.7% and faster than RX 590 by 0.8%. It has a strong relative performance against every graphics card here. Its results are actually indistinguishable from those of the GTX 980 Ti. It is a close call between the R9 FURY X and its rival GTX 980 by a small margin. In addition, the R9 FURY X was also faster than the R9 390 by a good margin.
| Board Number | C88001 |
|---|---|
| Length | 7.5 inches 191 mm |
| Outputs | 1x HDMI3x DisplayPort |
| Power Connectors | 2x 8-pin |
| Slot Width | Dual-slot |
| TDP | 275 W |
| GPU Clock | 1050 MHz |
|---|---|
| Memory Clock | 500 MHz 1000 MHz effective |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
|---|---|
| Generation | Pirate Islands (R9 300) |
| Launch Price | 649 USD |
| Production | Active |
| Release Date | Jun 24th, 2015 |
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) |
|---|---|
| OpenCL | 2 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.82 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 |
|---|---|
| Die Size | 596 mm² |
| GPU Name | Fiji |
| GPU Variant | Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040) |
| Process Size | 28 nm |
| Transistors | 8,900 million |
| Bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s |
|---|---|
| Memory Bus | 4096 bit |
| Memory Size | 4096 MB |
| Memory Type | HBM |
| Compute Units | 64 |
|---|---|
| ROPs | 64 |
| Shading Units | 4096 |
| TMUs | 256 |
| FP16 (half) performance | 8,602 GFLOPS (1:1) |
|---|---|
| FP32 (float) performance | 8,602 GFLOPS |
| FP64 (double) performance | 537.6 GFLOPS (1:16) |
| Pixel Rate | 67.20 GPixel/s |
| Texture Rate | 268.8 GTexel/s |
The Fury X uses an all-new chunk of silicon dubbed Fiji, as opposed to the die in the Radeon R9 290X, which was called Hawaii. Fiji is the beefiest GPU AMD has ever crafted, and it sports a ...
Conclusion: Fiji delivers, but also faces formidable competition. Unfortunately we are bringing you our Radeon R9 Fury X review a week late. AMD had limited samples ready for the release and only ...
Like the R9 295X2, the Fury X also features a red glowing Radeon logo across the top of the graphics card when powered on. In addition to the glowing logo, the Fury X features AMD's new GPU Tach LEDs.
While AMD introduced its highly anticipated Radeon R9 Fury X in June, we’re taking a deeper look at its power consumption and pump noise. Since we were able to procure our own retail board, we ...
The AMD Radeon R9 Fury X also supports the Asynchronous Shader technology AMD talked about recently. Asynchronous Shaders are a feature of new or next-gen APIs like DirectX 12, Vulkan, and AMD’s ...
AMD's Radeon R9 Fury X is released today, introducing HBM memory for graphics cards. The new card is built around a watercooled Fiji GPU, which enabled AMD to design a very compact card that will fit into many small-form-factor cases. Gaming performance at 4K is good and roughly matches the GTX 980 Ti.
AMD's Radeon R9 Fury X is released today, introducing HBM memory for graphics cards. The new card is built around a watercooled Fiji GPU, which enabled AMD to design a very compact card that will fit into many small-form-factor cases. Gaming performance at 4K is good and roughly matches the GTX 980 Ti.
AMD's Fiji GPU is finally here, in the form of a new flagship, liquid-cooled graphics card: Fury X
Radeon R9 Fury X specs. The Fiji processor in the R9 Fury X is based on AMD's third generation GCN architecture, previously found in the R9 295/380, and codenamed Tonga.
Conclusion. AMD is putting reviewers in a tough spot with Fury. On one hand, the Fiji GPU with HBM is a remarkable feat of engineering. ... I really like Sapphire’s Radeon R9 Fury Tri-X. The ...
AMD Radeon R9 Fury X – Under the Hood The R9 Fury X uses a brand-new GPU dubbed Fiji, but it’s based on the Graphics Core Next architecture that’s been inside AMD chips since 2011.
Radeon R9 Fury X benchmarks . As far as the games go, we used the in-game benchmarks provided with each, utilizing the stock graphics settings mentioned unless otherwise noted.
Catching up to the present, this month marks an important occasion for AMD with the launch of their new flagship GPU, Fiji, and the flagship video card based on it, the Radeon R9 Fury X.
The Radeon R9 FURY X is a high-end graphics card by AMD, launched in June 2015. Built on the 28 nm process, and based on the Fiji graphics processor, in its Fiji XT C8 variant, the card supports DirectX 12.0.
AMD Radeon R9 Fury X Radeon R9 290X Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti. GeForce GTX 980. MORE: Best Graphics Cards For The Money ... The Radeon R9 Fury X is born of the same DNA, with Graphics Core Next in ...
AMD says the Fury X is a reference design only, though the air-cooled Radeon R9 Fury scheduled for a July 14 release will have vendor-customized designs available.
Given the Radeon Fury X has the same board-power rating as the R9 290X, AMD also gave it a liquid-cooling solution in an effort to clinch the heat-and-noise game against NVIDIA's high-end "Maxwell" GPUs, including the GTX Titan X and the more recently launched GTX 980 Ti.
What to Consider Before Buying a Graphics Card
If you have been planning to upgrade your system by purchasing a new graphics card. Then there are some important factors to consider.
Resolution VS Quality: Impact on Game Performance
What affects game performance? Clarity or Details?
Ultra VS High Quality Settings in PC Games
Every player has a different notion about the ideal setting for PC games. But in most cases, opting for a High quality graphics configuration is the way to go.
What are CPU or GPU Bottlenecks?
Are you getting sudden frame drops? you might have a bottleneck.
What is the acceptable FPS speed for me?
For some games, you can still enjoy great garphics at lower frame rates.
GPU Hierarchy
GPU Compare
CPU Compare
Gaming Laptops
Gaming Monitors
Gaming Headsets
Discussion and Comments
Share Your Comments