R9 FURY з i7-4790K критеріями в Ультра якість настройках якості

На 1440p, R9 FURY може вразити 50-60 FPS на майже все в ультра, просто без згладжування, менш навколишнього оклюзії і повернув тіні. Варто відзначити, що R9 FURY це дуже Power голодних карт і вимагає гідного блоку харчування. З поточною 4096 оперативної пам'яті MB R9 FURY , може бути дуже мало, пов'язаних з пам'яттю вузькі місця в більш сучасних іграх.

Переглянути поточний прейскурант

R9 FURY з i7-4790K критеріями в Ультра якість настройках якості

Поділіться своїми коментарями 0

AMD Radeon R9 FURY

Ціна

₴ 15,163.4

Рік

2015

Максимальна записана температура

Макс вентилятор шум

Рекомендоване живлення

625W

Тест-процесор

Intel Core i7-4790K @ 4.00GHz ($306.99)

ПРОЦЕСОР вплив на FPS

+ 0.0 FPS

ПРОЦЕСОР вплив на FPS%

0.0%

Параметри якості тестів

Ultra Quality Settings

Середня продуктивність 1080p

66.0 FPS

Середня продуктивність 1440p

49.7 FPS

(Ultrawide) Середня продуктивність 1440p

42.7 FPS

Середній 4K продуктивність

30.1 FPS

Пам'яті

4 GB

Вартість 1080p за кадр

₴ 229.8

Вартість 1440p за кадр

₴ 305.2

(Ultrawide) Вартість 1440p за кадр

₴ 355.2

4K вартість за кадр

₴ 503.8

Серії

R9 FURY

Variant

AMD Radeon R9 FURY

Загальна оцінка комбінацій

Description	Metric	From	To	Weight
The release year of the graphics card. The newer the better technology and performance optimization and driver support.	Year	2016	2019	13
		2015	2016	11
		2014	2015	8
		2013	2014	4
		2007	2013	2
The price of the graphics card. The cheaper the better.	Price	0	250	35
		250	400	30
		400	550	25
		550	650	15
		650	9999	5
Power Supply Wattage required for overall system. The lower the better.	PSU	0	350	4
		350	450	4
		450	550	3
		550	650	2
		650	9999	1
Maximum recorded temperature under load. The lower the better for longer life of the graphics card.	Temp	0	70	2
		70	75	2
		75	80	1
		80	85	1
		85	999	1
Noise Levels under load. The lower the better.	Noise	0	45	2
		45	48	2
		48	50	2
		50	55	1
		55	999	1
Full HD performance at 1080p resolution. The higher the better.	FHD	60	9999	18
		55	60	13
		45	55	11
		35	45	7
		0	35	5
Quad HD performance at 1440p resolution. The higher the better.	QHD	60	9999	10
		55	60	8
		45	55	5
		35	45	4
		0	35	2
4K performance at 2160p resolution. The higher the better.	F4K	60	9999	5
		55	60	4
		45	55	3
		35	45	2
		0	35	1
Current CPU Impact on performance with respect to the highest performing CPU used for benchmark at the time this graphics card was released.	CPU	-5	9999	5
		-7	-5	4
		-10	-7	3
		-15	-10	2
		-9999	-15	1
Graphics card memory (RAM) capacity. The higher the better for higher resolution textures and future demanding games.	MEM	8	9999	5
		4	8	4
		2	4	3
		1	2	2
		0	1	1

		FROM	TO	VERDICT
The overall score is determined based on the calculated weightings for the individual components.	OVERALL SCORE	80	99	Excellent
		70	80	Very Good
		60	70	Good
		40	60	Acceptable
		0	40	Weak

68/100

Хороший

Порівнянні з

Змінити ЦП на

Change Variant To

Бажаний параметр якості

Хороша новина полягає в тому, що з випуском R9 FURY X ціна R9 FURY отримує більше знижок. R9 FURY набагато дорожче, ніж R9 390 оскільки коштує ₴ 15163.4. Порівняйте це з R9 390, AMD Radeon R9 390X, який спочатку був за ціною ₴ 9087, ₴ 11849. Тим часом, найближча еквівалентна карта NVIDIA - це GTX 980 яка коштує ₴ 15163.4.

Spec для spec, цей R9 FURY R9 390 прямого попередника, R9 390, похвалившись 10.7 % більше fps. На щастя, ігрові показники були досить вражаючими. R9 FURY послідовно забезпечує значне збільшення частоти кадрів протягом R9 390, AMD Radeon R9 390X і це справді виправдовує оновлення.

Порівняно з найближчим суперником NVIDIA GTX 980, R9 FURY був -10.4 % повільніше. Для 1080p Full HD ми змогли грати в GreedFall, Death Stranding, Final Fantasy XV, F1 2019, Spider-Man Remastered на 61 fps до 68 fps, а 65 частота кадрів 65 межах 65 fps.

Для 1440p Quad HD ми змогли грати в Overwatch 2, Strange Brigade, World War Z, Battlefield V, Fallout 76 на 61 fps до 72 fps, а 65 частота кадрів 65 межах 65 fps. Для 2160p 4K ми змогли грати в Valorant на 96 fps до 96 fps, а 96 частота кадрів 96 межах 96 fps.

Compare R9 FURY Variants Performance in Ультра якість

Assassin's Creed Valhalla (2020)

Ультра якість

Резолюція 1920x1080

Рік	Відеокарти	Ціна	Кадрів в секунду
2017	AMD Radeon RX Vega 56	₴ 11,020	45.2 FPS
2015	NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X	₴ 27,592	45.0 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070	₴ 11,020	43.0 FPS
2015	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti	₴ 17,925	35.2 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 FURY X	₴ 17,925	34.6 FPS
2018	AMD Radeon RX 590	₴ 7,706	34.3 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 Nano	₴ 17,925	32.6 FPS
2014	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980	₴ 15,163	31.9 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 FURY	₴ 15,163	30.9 FPS
2017	AMD Radeon RX 580	₴ 6,325	29.9 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB	₴ 7,016	29.3 FPS
2014	NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK	₴ 27,592	29.1 FPS
2012	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690	₴ 27,592	28.4 FPS
2016	AMD Radeon RX 480	₴ 11,048	28.1 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB	₴ 4,695	28.1 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon HD 7990	₴ 27,592	28.0 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 390X	₴ 11,849	27.9 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti	₴ 19,306	27.5 FPS
2017	AMD Radeon RX 570	₴ 4,668	27.4 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN	₴ 27,592	27.1 FPS
2014	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970	₴ 9,087	26.8 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon R9 290X	₴ 15,163	26.4 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 390	₴ 9,087	26.3 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon R9 290	₴ 11,020	24.6 FPS
2016	AMD Radeon RX 470	₴ 4,944	24.3 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780	₴ 17,925	22.1 FPS
2012	AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition	₴ 13,782	19.9 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 380X	₴ 6,325	19.8 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon R9 280X	₴ 8,258	19.7 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770	₴ 11,020	18.8 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti	₴ 4,668	18.3 FPS
2012	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680	₴ 13,782	17.9 FPS
2014	AMD Radeon R9 285	₴ 6,877	17.5 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 380	₴ 5,496	17.4 FPS
2014	AMD Radeon R9 280	₴ 7,706	17.2 FPS
2015	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960	₴ 5,496	17.0 FPS
2012	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670	₴ 11,020	16.5 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760	₴ 6,877	15.3 FPS
2012	AMD Radeon HD 7950	₴ 12,401	14.7 FPS
2018	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050	₴ 4,668	14.6 FPS
2012	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti	₴ 8,258	14.4 FPS
2012	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660	₴ 6,325	12.8 FPS
2012	AMD Radeon HD 7850	₴ 6,877	11.5 FPS

R9 FURY сидить між GTX 980 та RX 580 , падаючи повільніше GTX 980 на 3.2 % та швидше, ніж RX 580 на 3.3 %. Він має високу відносну продуктивність щодо кожної графічної карти тут. Крім того, R9 FURY також був швидшим, ніж R9 390 , з хорошою націнкою.

Cyberpunk 2077 (2020)

Ультра якість

Резолюція 1920x1080

Рік	Відеокарти	Ціна	Кадрів в секунду
2017	AMD Radeon RX Vega 56	₴ 11,020	45.2 FPS
2015	NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X	₴ 27,592	45.0 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070	₴ 11,020	43.0 FPS
2015	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti	₴ 17,925	35.2 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 FURY X	₴ 17,925	34.6 FPS
2018	AMD Radeon RX 590	₴ 7,706	34.3 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 Nano	₴ 17,925	32.6 FPS
2014	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980	₴ 15,163	31.9 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 FURY	₴ 15,163	30.9 FPS
2017	AMD Radeon RX 580	₴ 6,325	29.9 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB	₴ 7,016	29.3 FPS
2014	NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK	₴ 27,592	29.1 FPS
2012	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690	₴ 27,592	28.4 FPS
2016	AMD Radeon RX 480	₴ 11,048	28.1 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB	₴ 4,695	28.1 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon HD 7990	₴ 27,592	28.0 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 390X	₴ 11,849	27.9 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti	₴ 19,306	27.5 FPS
2017	AMD Radeon RX 570	₴ 4,668	27.4 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN	₴ 27,592	27.1 FPS
2014	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970	₴ 9,087	26.8 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon R9 290X	₴ 15,163	26.4 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 390	₴ 9,087	26.3 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon R9 290	₴ 11,020	24.6 FPS
2016	AMD Radeon RX 470	₴ 4,944	24.3 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780	₴ 17,925	22.1 FPS
2012	AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition	₴ 13,782	19.9 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 380X	₴ 6,325	19.8 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon R9 280X	₴ 8,258	19.7 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770	₴ 11,020	18.8 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti	₴ 4,668	18.3 FPS
2012	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680	₴ 13,782	17.9 FPS
2014	AMD Radeon R9 285	₴ 6,877	17.5 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 380	₴ 5,496	17.4 FPS
2014	AMD Radeon R9 280	₴ 7,706	17.2 FPS
2015	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960	₴ 5,496	17.0 FPS
2012	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670	₴ 11,020	16.5 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760	₴ 6,877	15.3 FPS
2012	AMD Radeon HD 7950	₴ 12,401	14.7 FPS
2018	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050	₴ 4,668	14.6 FPS
2012	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti	₴ 8,258	14.4 FPS
2012	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660	₴ 6,325	12.8 FPS
2012	AMD Radeon HD 7850	₴ 6,877	11.5 FPS

Call of Duty Modern Warfare (2019)

Ультра якість

Резолюція 1920x1080

Рік	Відеокарти	Ціна	Кадрів в секунду
2017	AMD Radeon RX Vega 56	₴ 11,020	120.5 FPS
2015	NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X	₴ 27,592	120.0 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070	₴ 11,020	114.7 FPS
2015	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti	₴ 17,925	93.8 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 FURY X	₴ 17,925	92.2 FPS
2018	AMD Radeon RX 590	₴ 7,706	91.5 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 Nano	₴ 17,925	87.0 FPS
2014	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980	₴ 15,163	85.0 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 FURY	₴ 15,163	82.4 FPS
2017	AMD Radeon RX 580	₴ 6,325	79.7 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB	₴ 7,016	78.0 FPS
2014	NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK	₴ 27,592	77.7 FPS
2012	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690	₴ 27,592	75.7 FPS
2016	AMD Radeon RX 480	₴ 11,048	75.0 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB	₴ 4,695	75.0 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon HD 7990	₴ 27,592	74.7 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 390X	₴ 11,849	74.4 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti	₴ 19,306	73.3 FPS
2017	AMD Radeon RX 570	₴ 4,668	73.0 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN	₴ 27,592	72.3 FPS
2014	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970	₴ 9,087	71.4 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon R9 290X	₴ 15,163	70.5 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 390	₴ 9,087	70.1 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon R9 290	₴ 11,020	65.7 FPS
2016	AMD Radeon RX 470	₴ 4,944	64.8 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780	₴ 17,925	58.9 FPS
2012	AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition	₴ 13,782	53.1 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 380X	₴ 6,325	52.9 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon R9 280X	₴ 8,258	52.4 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770	₴ 11,020	50.0 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti	₴ 4,668	48.7 FPS
2012	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680	₴ 13,782	47.6 FPS
2014	AMD Radeon R9 285	₴ 6,877	46.6 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 380	₴ 5,496	46.4 FPS
2014	AMD Radeon R9 280	₴ 7,706	45.8 FPS
2015	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960	₴ 5,496	45.2 FPS
2012	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670	₴ 11,020	44.1 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760	₴ 6,877	40.9 FPS
2012	AMD Radeon HD 7950	₴ 12,401	39.1 FPS
2018	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050	₴ 4,668	39.0 FPS
2012	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti	₴ 8,258	38.5 FPS
2012	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660	₴ 6,325	34.0 FPS
2012	AMD Radeon HD 7850	₴ 6,877	30.7 FPS

R9 FURY сидить між GTX 980 та RX 580 , падаючи повільніше GTX 980 на 3.2 % та швидше, ніж RX 580 на 3.4 %. Він має високу відносну продуктивність щодо кожної графічної карти тут. Крім того, R9 FURY також був швидшим, ніж R9 390 , з хорошою націнкою.

Продуктивність гри в Ультра якість настройках

Змінити настройки якості

Резолюція 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS

Рік	Гра	Кадрів в секунду
2023	Resident Evil 4	48 53.5
2023	A Plague Tale: Requiem	32 36.5
2023	Hogwarts Legacy	28 31.6
2023	The Last of Us Part I	21 24.3
2023	Forspoken	25 28.2
2023	The Callisto Protocol	19 21.9
2023	Dead Space	32 36.5
2023	Baldur's Gate 3	38 43.3
2023	Armored Core VI	38 43.3
2023	Immortals of Aveum	17 19.4
2023	Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart	35 38.9
2023	Remnant II	19 21.9
2023	Star Wars Jedi: Survivor	26 29.2
2023	Atomic Heart	26 29.2
2023	Starfield	13 14.6
2022	Elden Ring	36 40.0
2022	God of War	34 37.9
2022	Overwatch 2	63 70.5
2022	F1 22	39 43.7
2022	Dying Light 2	37 41.3
2022	Total War: Warhammer III	37 41.3
2022	Spider-Man Remastered	61 68.0
2022	Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II	43 48.6
2021	Forza Horizon 5	34 38.3
2021	Halo Infinite	26 29.3
2021	Battlefield 2042	48 54.0
2021	Hitman 3	50 55.9
2021	Far Cry 6	46 52.0
2021	Guardians of the Galaxy	51 56.9
2020	Watch Dogs: Legion	51 57.3
2020	Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27 30.9
2020	Microsoft Flight Simulator	18 20.2
2020	Valorant	121 135.5
2020	Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War	47 53.1
2020	Death Stranding	55 61.4
2020	Marvel's Avengers	36 40.0
2020	Godfall	53 59.7
2020	Cyberpunk 2077	27 30.9
2019	Apex Legends	64 72.0
2019	Anthem	41 46.4
2019	Far Cry New Dawn	61 68.0
2019	Resident Evil 2	74 83.2
2019	Metro Exodus	33 37.1
2019	World War Z	81 91.0
2019	Gears of War 5	48 54.0
2019	F1 2019	60 67.7
2019	GreedFall	54 61.0
2019	Borderlands 3	38 42.8
2019	Call of Duty Modern Warfare	74 82.4
2019	Red Dead Redemption 2	28 31.7
2019	Need For Speed: Heat	44 49.9
2018	Call of Duty: Black Ops 4	76 85.0
2018	Assassin's Creed Odyssey	34 38.0
2018	Final Fantasy XV	58 65.0
2018	Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45 51.0
2018	Just Cause 4	48 53.6
2018	Monster Hunter: World	51 57.7
2018	Strange Brigade	78 86.9
2018	Battlefield V	74 83.0
2017	Assassin's Creed Origins	49 55.0
2017	Destiny 2	94 105.0
2017	Need For Speed: Payback	66 74.2
2017	For Honor	89 98.9
2017	Project CARS 2	63 70.0
2017	Forza Motorsport 7	76 84.9
2016	Dishonored 2	45 51.1
2015	Rocket League	259 288.4
2015	Need For Speed	71 79.9
2015	Project CARS	68 76.6
2015	Rainbow Six Siege	126 140.1
2012	Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	178 197.8
2009	League of Legends	333 370.8

Резолюція 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS

Рік	Гра	Кадрів в секунду
2023	Resident Evil 4	31 38.9
2023	A Plague Tale: Requiem	21 26.7
2023	Hogwarts Legacy	19 24.3
2023	The Last of Us Part I	14 18.5
2023	Forspoken	14 18.5
2023	The Callisto Protocol	12 15.6
2023	Dead Space	19 24.3
2023	Baldur's Gate 3	28 35.0
2023	Armored Core VI	28 35.0
2023	Immortals of Aveum	10 13.6
2023	Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart	21 26.7
2023	Remnant II	11 14.6
2023	Star Wars Jedi: Survivor	17 21.9
2023	Atomic Heart	16 20.9
2023	Starfield	10 13.1
2022	Elden Ring	25 31.6
2022	God of War	26 32.5
2022	Overwatch 2	48 60.6
2022	F1 22	21 26.7
2022	Dying Light 2	21 26.7
2022	Total War: Warhammer III	23 29.2
2022	Spider-Man Remastered	38 48.6
2022	Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II	25 31.6
2021	Forza Horizon 5	26 33.0
2021	Halo Infinite	21 26.4
2021	Battlefield 2042	28 35.8
2021	Hitman 3	31 39.9
2021	Far Cry 6	31 38.9
2021	Guardians of the Galaxy	32 40.3
2020	Watch Dogs: Legion	29 37.4
2020	Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21 26.8
2020	Microsoft Flight Simulator	14 17.7
2020	Valorant	88 110.8
2020	Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War	33 41.6
2020	Death Stranding	38 47.6
2020	Marvel's Avengers	22 28.4
2020	Godfall	32 40.0
2020	Cyberpunk 2077	23 28.8
2019	Apex Legends	42 53.6
2019	Anthem	29 36.8
2019	Far Cry New Dawn	42 52.8
2019	Resident Evil 2	44 56.0
2019	Metro Exodus	23 28.8
2019	World War Z	53 66.4
2019	Gears of War 5	31 39.1
2019	F1 2019	38 48.0
2019	GreedFall	35 44.1
2019	Borderlands 3	24 30.1
2019	Call of Duty Modern Warfare	47 59.3
2019	Red Dead Redemption 2	20 26.0
2019	Need For Speed: Heat	31 39.1
2018	Call of Duty: Black Ops 4	40 50.0
2018	Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24 30.0
2018	Final Fantasy XV	36 46.0
2018	Shadow of the Tomb Raider	28 36.0
2018	Fallout 76	57 72.0
2018	Just Cause 4	31 39.6
2018	Monster Hunter: World	32 40.4
2018	Strange Brigade	48 60.6
2018	Battlefield V	53 67.0
2017	Assassin's Creed Origins	35 44.0
2017	Destiny 2	72 90.0
2017	Need For Speed: Payback	42 53.6
2017	For Honor	46 57.7
2017	Project CARS 2	39 49.4
2017	Forza Motorsport 7	61 76.6
2016	Dishonored 2	34 43.7
2015	Rocket League	98 123.6
2015	Need For Speed	49 61.8
2015	Project CARS	46 58.5
2015	Rainbow Six Siege	72 90.6
2012	Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	131 164.8
2009	League of Legends	164 206.0

Резолюція 3440x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS

Рік	Гра	Кадрів в секунду
2019	Apex Legends	34 45.8
2019	Anthem	23 30.4
2019	Far Cry New Dawn	32 43.2
2019	Resident Evil 2	33 44.7
2019	Metro Exodus	19 25.1
2019	World War Z	42 56.0
2019	Gears of War 5	25 34.1
2019	F1 2019	31 42.0
2019	GreedFall	25 33.3
2019	Borderlands 3	18 24.5
2019	Call of Duty Modern Warfare	38 50.7
2019	Red Dead Redemption 2	17 22.7
2019	Need For Speed: Heat	25 34.1
2018	Call of Duty: Black Ops 4	34 44.9
2018	Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20 27.3
2018	Final Fantasy XV	29 39.1
2018	Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21 28.9
2018	Fallout 76	45 59.9
2018	Just Cause 4	24 32.2
2018	Monster Hunter: World	24 32.0
2018	Strange Brigade	38 50.1
2018	Battlefield V	37 49.8
2017	Assassin's Creed Origins	29 38.5
2017	Destiny 2	54 72.2
2017	Need For Speed: Payback	36 48.5
2017	For Honor	35 46.3
2017	Project CARS 2	36 48.5
2017	Forza Motorsport 7	57 75.4
2016	Dishonored 2	31 41.9
2015	Rocket League	73 97.0
2015	Need For Speed	41 55.1
2015	Project CARS	40 53.3
2015	Rainbow Six Siege	53 70.9
2012	Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	127 167.5
2009	League of Legends	117 154.3

Резолюція 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS

Рік	Гра	Кадрів в секунду
2023	Resident Evil 4	20 29.2
2023	A Plague Tale: Requiem	11 17.0
2023	Hogwarts Legacy	11 17.0
2023	The Last of Us Part I	6 9.7
2023	Forspoken	6 8.7
2023	The Callisto Protocol	5 7.8
2023	Dead Space	6 9.7
2023	Baldur's Gate 3	13 19.4
2023	Armored Core VI	13 19.4
2023	Immortals of Aveum	4 6.3
2023	Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart	10 14.6
2023	Remnant II	5 7.3
2023	Star Wars Jedi: Survivor	7 10.7
2023	Atomic Heart	9 13.1
2023	Starfield	6 8.7
2022	Elden Ring	12 18.0
2022	God of War	17 25.3
2022	Overwatch 2	31 45.7
2022	F1 22	13 19.4
2022	Dying Light 2	13 19.4
2022	Total War: Warhammer III	15 21.9
2022	Spider-Man Remastered	23 34.0
2022	Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II	13 19.4
2021	Forza Horizon 5	17 25.5
2021	Halo Infinite	12 18.1
2021	Battlefield 2042	16 23.1
2021	Hitman 3	17 24.3
2021	Far Cry 6	14 20.9
2021	Guardians of the Galaxy	15 21.9
2020	Watch Dogs: Legion	17 24.3
2020	Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12 18.1
2020	Microsoft Flight Simulator	9 14.0
2020	Valorant	67 96.4
2020	Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War	15 22.2
2020	Death Stranding	20 28.9
2020	Marvel's Avengers	10 14.9
2020	Godfall	13 19.0
2020	Cyberpunk 2077	13 19.0
2019	Apex Legends	22 32.0
2019	Anthem	14 20.0
2019	Far Cry New Dawn	19 28.0
2019	Resident Evil 2	19 27.6
2019	Metro Exodus	12 18.1
2019	World War Z	26 38.2
2019	Gears of War 5	17 24.7
2019	F1 2019	21 30.5
2019	GreedFall	12 18.1
2019	Borderlands 3	10 15.7
2019	Call of Duty Modern Warfare	24 35.4
2019	Red Dead Redemption 2	11 16.5
2019	Need For Speed: Heat	17 24.7
2018	Call of Duty: Black Ops 4	23 34.0
2018	Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14 21.0
2018	Final Fantasy XV	18 27.0
2018	Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12 18.0
2018	Fallout 76	28 40.0
2018	Just Cause 4	14 20.6
2018	Monster Hunter: World	13 19.4
2018	Strange Brigade	23 33.0
2018	Battlefield V	18 26.0
2017	Assassin's Creed Origins	19 28.0
2017	Destiny 2	31 45.0
2017	Need For Speed: Payback	25 37.1
2017	For Honor	20 28.8
2017	Project CARS 2	28 41.2
2017	Forza Motorsport 7	45 64.3
2016	Dishonored 2	24 34.6
2015	Rocket League	40 57.7
2015	Need For Speed	28 41.2
2015	Project CARS	28 41.2
2015	Rainbow Six Siege	29 42.0
2012	Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	103 148.3
2009	League of Legends	57 82.4

R9 FURY with i7-4790K at 1080p and Ультра якість settings

R9 FURY with i7-4790K at 1440p and Ультра якість settings

R9 FURY with i7-4790K at 4K and Ультра якість settings

Порівняйте з конкурентами

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050
2018 3GB ₴ 3,563
66% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon RX 590
2018 8GB ₴ 5,911
20% faster

Compare

AMD Radeon RX 570
2017 4GB ₴ 3,397
10% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon RX 580
2017 8GB ₴ 4,171
8% faster

Compare

AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
2017 8GB ₴ 7,430
37% faster

Compare

AMD Radeon RX 470
2016 4GB ₴ 9,446
22% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon RX 480
2016 8GB ₴ 11,020
10% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
2016 4GB ₴ 3,563
51% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
2016 8GB ₴ 9,087
35% faster

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
2016 6GB ₴ 4,392
0% faster

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
2016 3GB ₴ 4,695
4% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
2015 2GB ₴ 2,458
0% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
2015 12GB ₴ 30,354
39% faster

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
2015 6GB ₴ 17,097
25% faster

Compare

AMD Radeon R9 380X
2015 4GB ₴ 6,325
40% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon R9 380
2015 2GB ₴ 8,258
50% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon R9 390
2015 8GB ₴ 12,843
10% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon R9 390X
2015 8GB ₴ 13,672
3% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
2015 4GB ₴ 17,925
0% faster

Compare

AMD Radeon R9 Nano
2015 4GB ₴ 42,231
0% faster

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
2014 6GB ₴ 27,592
0% faster

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
2014 4GB ₴ 6,877
11% faster

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
2014 4GB ₴ 12,401
6% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon R9 280
2014 3GB ₴ 9,667
52% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon R9 285
2014 2GB ₴ 10,496
50% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
2013 2GB ₴ 8,838
57% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
2013 3GB ₴ 11,324
9% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
2013 6GB ₴ 17,953
2% faster

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
2013 3GB ₴ 9,805
17% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
2013 2GB ₴ 4,944
43% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon HD 7990
2013 3GB ₴ 27,592
11% faster

Compare

AMD Radeon R9 290
2013 4GB ₴ 8,562
13% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon R9 280X
2013 3GB ₴ 9,667
35% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon R9 290X
2013 4GB ₴ 11,020
8% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
2012 2GB ₴ 2,182
64% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
2012 2GB ₴ 8,258
42% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
2012 2GB ₴ 2,182
30% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
2012 2GB ₴ 13,396
25% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
2012 2GB ₴ 12,125
18% faster

Compare

AMD Radeon HD 7950
2012 3GB ₴ 4,115
40% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition
2012 3GB ₴ 8,258
11% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon HD 7850
2012 2GB ₴ 6,877
64% slower

Compare

R9 FURY Специфікації

R9 FURY Board Design

Board Number	C88003
Outputs	1x HDMI3x DisplayPort
Power Connectors	2x 8-pin
Slot Width	Dual-slot
TDP	275 W

R9 FURY Clock Speeds

GPU Clock	1000 MHz
Memory Clock	500 MHz 1000 MHz effective

R9 FURY Graphics Card

Bus Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16
Generation	Pirate Islands (R9 300)
Launch Price	549 USD
Production	Active
Release Date	Jul 10th, 2015

R9 FURY Graphics Features

DirectX	12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL	2
OpenGL	4.5
Shader Model	6
Vulkan	1.1.82

R9 FURY Graphics Processor

Architecture	GCN 3.0
Die Size	596 mm²
GPU Name	Fiji
GPU Variant	Fiji PRO CB (215-0862046)
Process Size	28 nm
Transistors	8,900 million

R9 FURY Memory

Bandwidth	512.0 GB/s
Memory Bus	4096 bit
Memory Size	4096 MB
Memory Type	HBM

R9 FURY Render Config

Compute Units	56
ROPs	64
Shading Units	3584
TMUs	224

R9 FURY Theoretical Performance

FP16 (half) performance	7,168 GFLOPS (1:1)
FP32 (float) performance	7,168 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance	448.0 GFLOPS (1:16)
Pixel Rate	64.00 GPixel/s
Texture Rate	224.0 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews

Conclusion. AMD is putting reviewers in a tough spot with Fury. On one hand, the Fiji GPU with HBM is a remarkable feat of engineering. HBM is only in its infancy, but the technology already shows ...

The AMD Radeon R9 Fury Nano is one of the most exciting graphics cards I’ve seen for years and, at only 6in long, it’s also one of the smallest. ... Verdict. AMD’s latest card is one of its ...

Conclusion: Fiji delivers, but also faces formidable competition. Unfortunately we are bringing you our Radeon R9 Fury X review a week late. AMD had limited samples ready for the release and only ...

Verdict. If AMD and Nvidia’s flagship cards are too expensive then the AMD Radeon R9 Fury is a good option for high-end gameplay. Be warned, though – its power consumption is high. ...

AMD Radeon R9 Fury: the Digital Foundry verdict If you're looking for the cheapest single-chip GPU that can run a good proportion of games well at 4K resolution, the Radeon R9 Fury is a quality ...

Last week, AMD lifted the veil in its Radeon R7 and R9 300 series of products and publicly demoed its latest flagship, the Radeon R9 Fury X, at a small venue adjacent to E3. While the Radeon R7 ...

The R9 Fury X's power consumption is a real achievement by AMD. Given what we had seen in the past by the Radeon R9 290X and R9 390X, we had just naturally assumed that the Fury X would use a lot ...

The AMD Radeon R9 Fury X also supports the Asynchronous Shader technology AMD talked about recently. Asynchronous Shaders are a feature of new or next-gen APIs like DirectX 12, Vulkan, and AMD’s ...

AMD's Radeon R9 Fury X is released today, introducing HBM memory for graphics cards. The new card is built around a watercooled Fiji GPU, which enabled AMD to design a very compact card that will fit into many small-form-factor cases. Gaming performance at 4K is good and roughly matches the GTX 980 Ti.

In our review of AMD’s Radeon R9 Fury, we discovered that the Fury X’s air-cooled sibling packs a performance punch that justifies its competitive price tag. In fact, it punishes Nvidia’s ...

Radeon R9 Fury X specs. The Fiji processor in the R9 Fury X is based on AMD's third generation GCN architecture, previously found in the R9 295/380, and codenamed Tonga.

While AMD introduced its highly anticipated Radeon R9 Fury X in June, we’re taking a deeper look at its power consumption and pump noise. Since we were able to procure our own retail board, we ...

The Fury X uses an all-new chunk of silicon dubbed Fiji, as opposed to the die in the Radeon R9 290X, which was called Hawaii. Fiji is the beefiest GPU AMD has ever crafted, and it sports a ...

AMD says the Fury X is a reference design only, though the air-cooled Radeon R9 Fury scheduled for a July 14 release will have vendor-customized designs available.

Catching up to the present, this month marks an important occasion for AMD with the launch of their new flagship GPU, Fiji, and the flagship video card based on it, the Radeon R9 Fury X.

AMD's Radeon R9 Fury X is released today, introducing HBM memory for graphics cards. The new card is built around a watercooled Fiji GPU, which enabled AMD to design a very compact card that will fit into many small-form-factor cases. Gaming performance at 4K is good and roughly matches the GTX 980 Ti.

A bit over two weeks ago AMD launched their new flagship video card, the Radeon R9 Fury X.Based on the company’s new Fiji GPU, the R9 Fury X brought with it significant performance improvements ...

AMD does find itself in a somewhat strange position, what with arming Radeon R9 390X and 390 with 8GB and all. Still, we just don’t think the flagship’s halved capacity is much of a handicap.

Reference AMD Radeon R9 Fury specs. ... Of course, as Fiji is AMD’s latest and greatest GPU, the Nitro R9 Fury also supports AMD’s latest and greatest software features, like FreeSync, Virtual ...