R9 Nano 在超级品质质量设置下使用 i7-4790K 基准

在1440p， R9 Nano 可以在几乎所有的东西上达到50-60 fps，只是没有抗锯齿，更少的环境遮挡和拒绝阴影。决定是否在像 R9 Nano 这样的高端GPU上投入这么多钱需要仔细考虑。使用当前 4096 MB RAM， R9 Nano 在更现代的游戏中可能只有很少的与内存相关的瓶颈。

查看当前价格表

分享您的评论 1

AMD Radeon R9 Nano

价钱

¥ 10,596.0

年

2015

最高记录温度

73C

最大风扇噪音

45.8dB

推荐电源

525W

基准CPU

Intel Core i7-4790K @ 4.00GHz ($306.99)

CPU对FPS的影响

+ 0.0 FPS

CPU对FPS的影响％

0.0%

基准质量设置

Ultra Quality Settings

平均1080p性能

71.0 FPS

平均1440p表现

53.5 FPS

(Ultrawide) 平均1440p表现

46.0 FPS

平均4K性能

32.4 FPS

记忆

4 GB

每帧1080p成本

¥ 63.3

1440p每帧成本

¥ 84.1

(Ultrawide) 1440p每帧成本

¥ 97.8

每帧4K成本

¥ 138.8

系列

R9 Nano

Variant

AMD Radeon R9 Nano

总体组合分数

Description	Metric	From	To	Weight
The release year of the graphics card. The newer the better technology and performance optimization and driver support.	Year	2016	2019	13
		2015	2016	11
		2014	2015	8
		2013	2014	4
		2007	2013	2
The price of the graphics card. The cheaper the better.	Price	0	250	35
		250	400	30
		400	550	25
		550	650	15
		650	9999	5
Power Supply Wattage required for overall system. The lower the better.	PSU	0	350	4
		350	450	4
		450	550	3
		550	650	2
		650	9999	1
Maximum recorded temperature under load. The lower the better for longer life of the graphics card.	Temp	0	70	2
		70	75	2
		75	80	1
		80	85	1
		85	999	1
Noise Levels under load. The lower the better.	Noise	0	45	2
		45	48	2
		48	50	2
		50	55	1
		55	999	1
Full HD performance at 1080p resolution. The higher the better.	FHD	60	9999	18
		55	60	13
		45	55	11
		35	45	7
		0	35	5
Quad HD performance at 1440p resolution. The higher the better.	QHD	60	9999	10
		55	60	8
		45	55	5
		35	45	4
		0	35	2
4K performance at 2160p resolution. The higher the better.	F4K	60	9999	5
		55	60	4
		45	55	3
		35	45	2
		0	35	1
Current CPU Impact on performance with respect to the highest performing CPU used for benchmark at the time this graphics card was released.	CPU	-5	9999	5
		-7	-5	4
		-10	-7	3
		-15	-10	2
		-9999	-15	1
Graphics card memory (RAM) capacity. The higher the better for higher resolution textures and future demanding games.	MEM	8	9999	5
		4	8	4
		2	4	3
		1	2	2
		0	1	1

		FROM	TO	VERDICT
The overall score is determined based on the calculated weightings for the individual components.	OVERALL SCORE	80	99	Excellent
		70	80	Very Good
		60	70	Good
		40	60	Acceptable
		0	40	Weak

49/100

可接受

相比于

将CPU更改为

Change Variant To

期望的质量设定

R9 Nano 比 R9 390 贵得多，因为它花费了很多 ¥ 4497.6 。将其与 R9 390, AMD Radeon R9 390X 进行比较，后者最初的价格为 ¥ 2280, ¥ 2973 。同时， NVIDIA 最接近的等效卡是 GTX 980 ，其费用为 ¥ 3804.6 。规范的规范，这个 R9 Nano 通过吹嘘 19.1 ％fps来超越它的直接前身 R9 390 。

幸运的是，游戏性能令人印象深刻。 R9 Nano 始终比 R9 390, AMD Radeon R9 390X 提供更高的帧速率，并且它确实有理由进行升级。与其 NVIDIA 最接近的竞争对手 GTX 980 ， R9 Nano -3.7 慢了 -3.7 ％。

对于 1080p Full HD ，我们能够以 60 fps到 63 fps玩 Hitman 3, Monster Hunter: World, Guardians of the Galaxy, Watch Dogs: Legion, Final Fantasy XV ，保持帧率在 61 fps附近徘徊。对于 1440p Quad HD ，我们能够以 63 fps到 70 fps玩 Call of Duty Modern Warfare, World War Z, Overwatch 2, Strange Brigade, Fallout 76 ，保持帧率在 65 fps附近徘徊。

对于 2160p 4K ，我们能够以 102 fps到 102 fps玩 Valorant ，保持帧率在 102 fps附近徘徊。

Compare R9 Nano Variants Performance in 超级品质

Assassin's Creed Valhalla (2020)

超级品质

解析度 1920x1080

年	显卡	价钱	每秒帧数
2017	AMD Radeon RX Vega 64	¥ 3,458	46.7 FPS
2017	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti	¥ 2,834	46.3 FPS
2017	AMD Radeon RX Vega 56	¥ 2,765	45.2 FPS
2015	NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X	¥ 6,923	45.0 FPS
2014	AMD Radeon R9 295X2	¥ 10,388	44.3 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070	¥ 2,765	43.0 FPS
2015	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti	¥ 4,498	35.2 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 FURY X	¥ 4,498	34.6 FPS
2018	AMD Radeon RX 590	¥ 1,934	34.3 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 Nano	¥ 4,498	32.6 FPS
2014	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980	¥ 3,805	31.9 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 FURY	¥ 3,805	30.9 FPS
2017	AMD Radeon RX 580	¥ 1,587	29.9 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB	¥ 1,760	29.3 FPS
2014	NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK	¥ 6,923	29.1 FPS
2012	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690	¥ 6,923	28.4 FPS
2016	AMD Radeon RX 480	¥ 2,772	28.1 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB	¥ 1,178	28.1 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon HD 7990	¥ 6,923	28.0 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 390X	¥ 2,973	27.9 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti	¥ 4,844	27.5 FPS
2017	AMD Radeon RX 570	¥ 1,171	27.4 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN	¥ 6,923	27.1 FPS
2014	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970	¥ 2,280	26.8 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon R9 290X	¥ 3,805	26.4 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 390	¥ 2,280	26.3 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon R9 290	¥ 2,765	24.6 FPS
2016	AMD Radeon RX 470	¥ 1,241	24.3 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780	¥ 4,498	22.1 FPS
2012	AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition	¥ 3,458	19.9 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 380X	¥ 1,587	19.8 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon R9 280X	¥ 2,072	19.7 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770	¥ 2,765	18.8 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti	¥ 1,171	18.3 FPS
2012	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680	¥ 3,458	17.9 FPS
2014	AMD Radeon R9 285	¥ 1,726	17.5 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 380	¥ 1,379	17.4 FPS
2014	AMD Radeon R9 280	¥ 1,934	17.2 FPS
2015	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960	¥ 1,379	17.0 FPS
2012	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670	¥ 2,765	16.5 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760	¥ 1,726	15.3 FPS
2012	AMD Radeon HD 7950	¥ 3,112	14.7 FPS
2012	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti	¥ 2,072	14.4 FPS

R9 Nano 位于 RX 590 和 GTX 980 ，慢于 RX 590 5.2 ％，比 GTX 980 2.2 ％。它在这里对每一块显卡都有很强的相对性能。 R9 Nano 和它的竞争对手 GTX 980 之间的距离很小。此外， R9 Nano 也比 R9 390 快了很多。

Forza Horizon 4 (2018)

超级品质

解析度 1920x1080

年	显卡	价钱	每秒帧数
2017	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti	¥ 2,834	105.0 FPS
2015	NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X	¥ 6,923	100.0 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070	¥ 2,765	96.0 FPS
2015	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti	¥ 4,498	94.0 FPS
2017	AMD Radeon RX Vega 64	¥ 3,458	91.0 FPS
2017	AMD Radeon RX Vega 56	¥ 2,765	89.0 FPS
2018	AMD Radeon RX 590	¥ 1,934	75.5 FPS
2014	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980	¥ 3,805	73.0 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB	¥ 1,760	70.2 FPS
2017	AMD Radeon RX 580	¥ 1,587	68.2 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 FURY X	¥ 4,498	68.0 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB	¥ 1,178	66.6 FPS
2014	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970	¥ 2,280	63.4 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 Nano	¥ 4,498	63.0 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 390X	¥ 2,973	57.0 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN	¥ 6,923	54.0 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon R9 290	¥ 2,765	53.0 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 390	¥ 2,280	52.0 FPS
2017	AMD Radeon RX 570	¥ 1,171	52.0 FPS
2016	AMD Radeon RX 470	¥ 1,241	45.0 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti	¥ 4,844	42.6 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780	¥ 4,498	41.0 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 380X	¥ 1,587	40.0 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 380	¥ 1,379	38.0 FPS
2015	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960	¥ 1,379	38.0 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti	¥ 1,171	37.2 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon R9 290X	¥ 3,805	37.0 FPS
2012	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680	¥ 3,458	37.0 FPS
2012	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670	¥ 2,765	35.0 FPS
2014	AMD Radeon R9 285	¥ 1,726	32.0 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760	¥ 1,726	31.5 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770	¥ 2,765	30.4 FPS
2014	AMD Radeon R9 280	¥ 1,934	29.0 FPS

R9 Nano 位于 GTX 970 和 R9 390X ，慢于 GTX 970 0.6 ％，比 R9 390X 10.5 ％。它具有与此处每个图形卡相对的平均相对性能。 R9 Nano 在这场比赛中的表现徘徊在60fps左右。其结果实际上与 GTX 970 结果无法区分。此外， R9 Nano 也比 R9 390 快了很多。

Cyberpunk 2077 (2020)

超级品质

解析度 1920x1080

年	显卡	价钱	每秒帧数
2017	AMD Radeon RX Vega 64	¥ 3,458	46.7 FPS
2017	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti	¥ 2,834	46.3 FPS
2017	AMD Radeon RX Vega 56	¥ 2,765	45.2 FPS
2015	NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X	¥ 6,923	45.0 FPS
2014	AMD Radeon R9 295X2	¥ 10,388	44.3 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070	¥ 2,765	43.0 FPS
2015	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti	¥ 4,498	35.2 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 FURY X	¥ 4,498	34.6 FPS
2018	AMD Radeon RX 590	¥ 1,934	34.3 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 Nano	¥ 4,498	32.6 FPS
2014	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980	¥ 3,805	31.9 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 FURY	¥ 3,805	30.9 FPS
2017	AMD Radeon RX 580	¥ 1,587	29.9 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB	¥ 1,760	29.3 FPS
2014	NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK	¥ 6,923	29.1 FPS
2012	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690	¥ 6,923	28.4 FPS
2016	AMD Radeon RX 480	¥ 2,772	28.1 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB	¥ 1,178	28.1 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon HD 7990	¥ 6,923	28.0 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 390X	¥ 2,973	27.9 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti	¥ 4,844	27.5 FPS
2017	AMD Radeon RX 570	¥ 1,171	27.4 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN	¥ 6,923	27.1 FPS
2014	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970	¥ 2,280	26.8 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon R9 290X	¥ 3,805	26.4 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 390	¥ 2,280	26.3 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon R9 290	¥ 2,765	24.6 FPS
2016	AMD Radeon RX 470	¥ 1,241	24.3 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780	¥ 4,498	22.1 FPS
2012	AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition	¥ 3,458	19.9 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 380X	¥ 1,587	19.8 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon R9 280X	¥ 2,072	19.7 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770	¥ 2,765	18.8 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti	¥ 1,171	18.3 FPS
2012	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680	¥ 3,458	17.9 FPS
2014	AMD Radeon R9 285	¥ 1,726	17.5 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 380	¥ 1,379	17.4 FPS
2014	AMD Radeon R9 280	¥ 1,934	17.2 FPS
2015	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960	¥ 1,379	17.0 FPS
2012	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670	¥ 2,765	16.5 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760	¥ 1,726	15.3 FPS
2012	AMD Radeon HD 7950	¥ 3,112	14.7 FPS
2012	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti	¥ 2,072	14.4 FPS

Grand Theft Auto V (2015)

超级品质

解析度 1920x1080

年	显卡	价钱	每秒帧数
2017	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti	¥ 2,834	100.1 FPS
2014	AMD Radeon R9 295X2	¥ 10,388	96.9 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070	¥ 2,765	92.7 FPS
2017	AMD Radeon RX Vega 64	¥ 3,458	83.7 FPS
2017	AMD Radeon RX Vega 56	¥ 2,765	83.6 FPS
2015	NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X	¥ 6,923	82.4 FPS
2015	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti	¥ 4,498	80.0 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 FURY X	¥ 4,498	70.0 FPS
2018	AMD Radeon RX 590	¥ 1,934	66.4 FPS
2014	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980	¥ 3,805	65.7 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 Nano	¥ 4,498	62.1 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB	¥ 1,760	61.4 FPS
2017	AMD Radeon RX 580	¥ 1,587	60.0 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB	¥ 1,178	58.3 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 390X	¥ 2,973	58.1 FPS
2014	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970	¥ 2,280	56.2 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 390	¥ 2,280	55.5 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN	¥ 6,923	51.7 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780	¥ 4,498	51.0 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon R9 290	¥ 2,765	50.7 FPS
2017	AMD Radeon RX 570	¥ 1,171	50.3 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon R9 290X	¥ 3,805	47.7 FPS
2016	AMD Radeon RX 470	¥ 1,241	47.7 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti	¥ 4,844	44.1 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 380X	¥ 1,587	38.1 FPS
2012	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680	¥ 3,458	37.8 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 380	¥ 1,379	37.4 FPS
2012	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670	¥ 2,765	36.3 FPS
2015	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960	¥ 1,379	35.9 FPS
2014	AMD Radeon R9 285	¥ 1,726	35.7 FPS
2014	AMD Radeon R9 280	¥ 1,934	35.6 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti	¥ 1,171	32.7 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770	¥ 2,765	31.5 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760	¥ 1,726	31.1 FPS

R9 Nano 位于 GTX 980 和 GTX 1060 6GB ，慢于 GTX 980 5.8 ％，比 GTX 1060 6GB 1.1 ％。它具有与此处每个图形卡相对的平均相对性能。 R9 Nano 在这场比赛中的表现徘徊在60fps左右。此外， R9 Nano 也比 R9 390 快了很多。

Call of Duty Modern Warfare (2019)

超级品质

解析度 1920x1080

年	显卡	价钱	每秒帧数
2017	AMD Radeon RX Vega 64	¥ 3,458	124.5 FPS
2017	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti	¥ 2,834	123.5 FPS
2017	AMD Radeon RX Vega 56	¥ 2,765	120.5 FPS
2015	NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X	¥ 6,923	120.0 FPS
2014	AMD Radeon R9 295X2	¥ 10,388	118.0 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070	¥ 2,765	114.7 FPS
2015	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti	¥ 4,498	93.8 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 FURY X	¥ 4,498	92.2 FPS
2018	AMD Radeon RX 590	¥ 1,934	91.5 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 Nano	¥ 4,498	87.0 FPS
2014	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980	¥ 3,805	85.0 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 FURY	¥ 3,805	82.4 FPS
2017	AMD Radeon RX 580	¥ 1,587	79.7 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB	¥ 1,760	78.0 FPS
2014	NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK	¥ 6,923	77.7 FPS
2012	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690	¥ 6,923	75.7 FPS
2016	AMD Radeon RX 480	¥ 2,772	75.0 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB	¥ 1,178	75.0 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon HD 7990	¥ 6,923	74.7 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 390X	¥ 2,973	74.4 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti	¥ 4,844	73.3 FPS
2017	AMD Radeon RX 570	¥ 1,171	73.0 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN	¥ 6,923	72.3 FPS
2014	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970	¥ 2,280	71.4 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon R9 290X	¥ 3,805	70.5 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 390	¥ 2,280	70.1 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon R9 290	¥ 2,765	65.7 FPS
2016	AMD Radeon RX 470	¥ 1,241	64.8 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780	¥ 4,498	58.9 FPS
2012	AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition	¥ 3,458	53.1 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 380X	¥ 1,587	52.9 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon R9 280X	¥ 2,072	52.4 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770	¥ 2,765	50.0 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti	¥ 1,171	48.7 FPS
2012	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680	¥ 3,458	47.6 FPS
2014	AMD Radeon R9 285	¥ 1,726	46.6 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 380	¥ 1,379	46.4 FPS
2014	AMD Radeon R9 280	¥ 1,934	45.8 FPS
2015	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960	¥ 1,379	45.2 FPS
2012	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670	¥ 2,765	44.1 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760	¥ 1,726	40.9 FPS
2012	AMD Radeon HD 7950	¥ 3,112	39.1 FPS
2012	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti	¥ 2,072	38.5 FPS

R9 Nano 位于 RX 590 和 GTX 980 ，慢于 RX 590 5.2 ％，比 GTX 980 2.4 ％。它在这里对每一块显卡都有很强的相对性能。 R9 Nano 和它的竞争对手 GTX 980 之间的距离很小。此外， R9 Nano 也比 R9 390 快了很多。

超级品质设置下的游戏性能

更改质量设置

解析度 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS

年	游戏	每秒帧数
2023	Resident Evil 4	51 57.5
2023	A Plague Tale: Requiem	35 39.2
2023	Hogwarts Legacy	30 34.0
2023	The Last of Us Part I	23 26.2
2023	Forspoken	27 30.3
2023	The Callisto Protocol	21 23.5
2023	Dead Space	35 39.2
2023	Baldur's Gate 3	41 46.5
2023	Armored Core VI	41 46.5
2023	Immortals of Aveum	18 20.9
2023	Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart	37 41.8
2023	Remnant II	21 23.5
2023	Star Wars Jedi: Survivor	28 31.4
2023	Atomic Heart	28 31.4
2023	Starfield	14 15.7
2022	Elden Ring	37 42.2
2022	God of War	36 40.0
2022	Overwatch 2	66 74.4
2022	F1 22	42 47.1
2022	Dying Light 2	40 44.5
2022	Total War: Warhammer III	40 44.5
2022	Spider-Man Remastered	65 73.2
2022	Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II	47 52.3
2021	Forza Horizon 5	36 40.5
2021	Halo Infinite	27 30.9
2021	Battlefield 2042	51 57.0
2021	Hitman 3	54 60.1
2021	Far Cry 6	50 56.0
2021	Guardians of the Galaxy	55 61.2
2020	Watch Dogs: Legion	55 61.7
2020	Assassin's Creed Valhalla	29 32.6
2020	Microsoft Flight Simulator	19 21.3
2020	Valorant	128 143.1
2020	Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War	50 56.1
2020	Death Stranding	58 64.8
2020	Marvel's Avengers	37 42.2
2020	Godfall	56 63.1
2020	Cyberpunk 2077	29 32.6
2019	Apex Legends	64 72.0
2019	Anthem	41 46.4
2019	Far Cry New Dawn	61 68.0
2019	Resident Evil 2	79 87.9
2019	Metro Exodus	35 39.1
2019	World War Z	78 87.0
2019	Gears of War 5	51 57.0
2019	F1 2019	64 71.5
2019	GreedFall	57 64.4
2019	Borderlands 3	40 45.2
2019	Call of Duty Modern Warfare	78 87.0
2019	Red Dead Redemption 2	30 33.5
2019	Need For Speed: Heat	47 52.6
2018	Call of Duty: Black Ops 4	71 79.0
2018	Assassin's Creed Odyssey	33 37.0
2018	Final Fantasy XV	56 63.0
2018	Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45 50.0
2018	Forza Horizon 4	56 63.0
2018	Fallout 76	61 68.0
2018	Hitman 2	47 53.0
2018	Just Cause 4	50 56.5
2018	Monster Hunter: World	54 60.9
2018	Strange Brigade	82 91.8
2018	Battlefield V	58 65.0
2017	Assassin's Creed Origins	47 53.0
2017	Destiny 2	91 102.0
2017	PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds	47 53.0
2017	Fortnite Battle Royale	57 63.7
2017	Need For Speed: Payback	70 78.3
2017	For Honor	93 104.4
2017	Project CARS 2	66 73.9
2017	Forza Motorsport 7	80 89.6
2016	Ashes of the Singularity	49 55.2
2016	Hitman	75 83.8
2016	Rise of the Tomb Raider	64 71.2
2016	The Division	58 64.6
2016	Overwatch	88 98.7
2016	Dishonored 2	48 53.9
2015	DiRT Rally	102 114.2
2015	Grand Theft Auto V	55 62.1
2015	The Witcher 3	53 59.2
2015	Total War: Attila	50 55.9
2015	Rocket League	274 304.5
2015	Need For Speed	75 84.4
2015	Project CARS	72 80.9
2015	Rainbow Six Siege	133 147.9
2014	Civilization: Beyond Earth	101 113.2
2014	Dragon Age: Inquisition	71 79.6
2014	Far Cry 4	67 75.0
2014	GRID Autosport	72 80.1
2014	Shadow of Mordor	92 103.0
2014	The Talos Principle	102 113.9
2013	Crysis 3	63 70.2
2013	Battlefield 4	79 88.8
2012	Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	187 208.8
2009	League of Legends	352 391.5

解析度 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS

年	游戏	每秒帧数
2023	Resident Evil 4	33 41.8
2023	A Plague Tale: Requiem	23 28.8
2023	Hogwarts Legacy	20 26.2
2023	The Last of Us Part I	15 19.9
2023	Forspoken	15 19.9
2023	The Callisto Protocol	13 16.7
2023	Dead Space	20 26.2
2023	Baldur's Gate 3	30 37.7
2023	Armored Core VI	30 37.7
2023	Immortals of Aveum	11 14.6
2023	Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart	23 28.8
2023	Remnant II	12 15.7
2023	Star Wars Jedi: Survivor	18 23.5
2023	Atomic Heart	18 22.5
2023	Starfield	11 14.1
2022	Elden Ring	26 33.3
2022	God of War	27 34.4
2022	Overwatch 2	51 63.9
2022	F1 22	23 28.8
2022	Dying Light 2	23 28.8
2022	Total War: Warhammer III	25 31.4
2022	Spider-Man Remastered	41 52.3
2022	Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II	27 34.0
2021	Forza Horizon 5	27 34.8
2021	Halo Infinite	22 27.8
2021	Battlefield 2042	30 37.8
2021	Hitman 3	34 42.9
2021	Far Cry 6	33 41.8
2021	Guardians of the Galaxy	34 43.4
2020	Watch Dogs: Legion	32 40.3
2020	Assassin's Creed Valhalla	22 28.3
2020	Microsoft Flight Simulator	14 18.7
2020	Valorant	93 117.0
2020	Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War	35 43.9
2020	Death Stranding	40 50.3
2020	Marvel's Avengers	24 30.0
2020	Godfall	33 42.2
2020	Cyberpunk 2077	24 30.5
2019	Apex Legends	42 53.6
2019	Anthem	29 36.8
2019	Far Cry New Dawn	42 52.8
2019	Resident Evil 2	47 59.2
2019	Metro Exodus	24 30.4
2019	World War Z	50 63.5
2019	Gears of War 5	33 41.3
2019	F1 2019	40 50.6
2019	GreedFall	37 46.5
2019	Borderlands 3	25 31.8
2019	Call of Duty Modern Warfare	50 62.6
2019	Red Dead Redemption 2	21 27.4
2019	Need For Speed: Heat	33 41.3
2018	Call of Duty: Black Ops 4	37 47.0
2018	Assassin's Creed Odyssey	23 29.0
2018	Final Fantasy XV	36 45.0
2018	Shadow of the Tomb Raider	28 35.0
2018	Forza Horizon 4	43 54.0
2018	Fallout 76	56 70.0
2018	Hitman 2	28 35.0
2018	Just Cause 4	33 41.8
2018	Monster Hunter: World	34 42.6
2018	Strange Brigade	51 63.9
2018	Battlefield V	40 51.0
2017	Assassin's Creed Origins	33 42.0
2017	Destiny 2	70 88.0
2017	PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds	32 40.0
2017	Fortnite Battle Royale	33 41.3
2017	Need For Speed: Payback	45 56.5
2017	For Honor	48 60.9
2017	Project CARS 2	41 52.2
2017	Forza Motorsport 7	64 80.9
2016	Ashes of the Singularity	39 49.0
2016	Hitman	51 64.4
2016	Rise of the Tomb Raider	40 50.7
2016	The Division	38 48.5
2016	Overwatch	54 67.9
2016	Dishonored 2	36 46.1
2015	DiRT Rally	65 82.3
2015	Grand Theft Auto V	35 44.6
2015	The Witcher 3	36 45.9
2015	Total War: Attila	31 39.8
2015	Rocket League	104 130.5
2015	Need For Speed	52 65.2
2015	Project CARS	49 61.8
2015	Rainbow Six Siege	76 95.7
2014	Civilization: Beyond Earth	72 90.2
2014	Dragon Age: Inquisition	45 56.8
2014	Far Cry 4	55 68.8
2014	GRID Autosport	65 81.3
2014	Shadow of Mordor	60 75.0
2014	The Talos Principle	67 84.6
2013	Crysis 3	37 46.8
2013	Battlefield 4	48 60.6
2012	Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	139 174.0
2009	League of Legends	174 217.5

解析度 3440x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS

年	游戏	每秒帧数
2019	Apex Legends	34 45.8
2019	Anthem	23 30.4
2019	Far Cry New Dawn	32 43.2
2019	Resident Evil 2	35 47.2
2019	Metro Exodus	20 26.5
2019	World War Z	40 53.5
2019	Gears of War 5	27 36.1
2019	F1 2019	33 44.3
2019	GreedFall	26 35.1
2019	Borderlands 3	19 25.8
2019	Call of Duty Modern Warfare	40 53.5
2019	Red Dead Redemption 2	18 24.0
2019	Need For Speed: Heat	27 36.1
2018	Call of Duty: Black Ops 4	32 42.8
2018	Assassin's Creed Odyssey	19 26.2
2018	Final Fantasy XV	28 38.0
2018	Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21 28.4
2018	Forza Horizon 4	36 47.6
2018	Fallout 76	44 58.3
2018	Hitman 2	22 29.4
2018	Just Cause 4	25 34.0
2018	Monster Hunter: World	25 33.7
2018	Strange Brigade	40 52.8
2018	Battlefield V	30 40.1
2017	Assassin's Creed Origins	28 36.9
2017	Destiny 2	53 70.6
2017	PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds	25 33.7
2017	Fortnite Battle Royale	25 34.1
2017	Need For Speed: Payback	38 51.1
2017	For Honor	37 48.8
2017	Project CARS 2	38 51.2
2017	Forza Motorsport 7	60 79.6
2016	Ashes of the Singularity	35 46.5
2016	Hitman	41 54.4
2016	Rise of the Tomb Raider	31 41.9
2016	The Division	31 40.8
2016	Overwatch	41 55.1
2016	Dishonored 2	33 44.2
2015	DiRT Rally	52 69.0
2015	Grand Theft Auto V	27 35.7
2015	The Witcher 3	30 39.5
2015	Total War: Attila	30 40.3
2015	Rocket League	77 102.4
2015	Need For Speed	44 58.2
2015	Project CARS	42 56.3
2015	Rainbow Six Siege	57 75.0
2014	Civilization: Beyond Earth	60 79.1
2014	Dragon Age: Inquisition	35 46.9
2014	Far Cry 4	43 56.9
2014	GRID Autosport	55 72.5
2014	Shadow of Mordor	47 62.6
2014	The Talos Principle	54 71.2
2013	Crysis 3	28 37.5
2013	Battlefield 4	42 56.4
2012	Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	134 176.9
2009	League of Legends	123 162.9

解析度 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS

年	游戏	每秒帧数
2023	Resident Evil 4	21 31.4
2023	A Plague Tale: Requiem	12 18.3
2023	Hogwarts Legacy	12 18.3
2023	The Last of Us Part I	7 10.5
2023	Forspoken	6 9.4
2023	The Callisto Protocol	5 8.4
2023	Dead Space	7 10.5
2023	Baldur's Gate 3	14 20.9
2023	Armored Core VI	14 20.9
2023	Immortals of Aveum	4 6.8
2023	Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart	10 15.7
2023	Remnant II	5 7.8
2023	Star Wars Jedi: Survivor	8 11.5
2023	Atomic Heart	9 14.1
2023	Starfield	6 9.4
2022	Elden Ring	13 19.0
2022	God of War	18 26.7
2022	Overwatch 2	33 48.3
2022	F1 22	14 20.9
2022	Dying Light 2	14 20.9
2022	Total War: Warhammer III	16 23.5
2022	Spider-Man Remastered	25 36.6
2022	Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II	14 20.9
2021	Forza Horizon 5	18 27.0
2021	Halo Infinite	13 19.1
2021	Battlefield 2042	17 24.4
2021	Hitman 3	18 26.2
2021	Far Cry 6	15 22.5
2021	Guardians of the Galaxy	16 23.5
2020	Watch Dogs: Legion	18 26.2
2020	Assassin's Creed Valhalla	13 19.1
2020	Microsoft Flight Simulator	10 14.8
2020	Valorant	71 101.8
2020	Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War	16 23.5
2020	Death Stranding	21 30.5
2020	Marvel's Avengers	10 15.7
2020	Godfall	14 20.1
2020	Cyberpunk 2077	14 20.0
2019	Apex Legends	22 32.0
2019	Anthem	14 20.0
2019	Far Cry New Dawn	19 28.0
2019	Resident Evil 2	20 29.1
2019	Metro Exodus	13 19.1
2019	World War Z	25 36.5
2019	Gears of War 5	18 26.1
2019	F1 2019	22 32.2
2019	GreedFall	13 19.1
2019	Borderlands 3	11 16.5
2019	Call of Duty Modern Warfare	26 37.4
2019	Red Dead Redemption 2	12 17.4
2019	Need For Speed: Heat	18 26.1
2018	Call of Duty: Black Ops 4	23 33.0
2018	Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14 20.0
2018	Final Fantasy XV	18 26.0
2018	Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12 18.0
2018	Forza Horizon 4	24 35.0
2018	Fallout 76	27 39.0
2018	Hitman 2	14 20.0
2018	Just Cause 4	15 21.8
2018	Monster Hunter: World	14 20.4
2018	Strange Brigade	24 34.8
2018	Battlefield V	16 24.0
2017	Assassin's Creed Origins	18 27.0
2017	Destiny 2	30 44.0
2017	PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds	16 23.0
2017	Fortnite Battle Royale	15 22.4
2017	Need For Speed: Payback	27 39.1
2017	For Honor	21 30.4
2017	Project CARS 2	30 43.5
2017	Forza Motorsport 7	47 67.9
2016	Ashes of the Singularity	26 38.0
2016	Hitman	26 37.2
2016	Rise of the Tomb Raider	19 27.6
2016	The Division	19 27.7
2016	Overwatch	24 35.0
2016	Dishonored 2	25 36.5
2015	DiRT Rally	32 46.6
2015	Grand Theft Auto V	15 22.1
2015	The Witcher 3	19 28.0
2015	Total War: Attila	24 35.5
2015	Rocket League	42 60.9
2015	Need For Speed	30 43.5
2015	Project CARS	30 43.5
2015	Rainbow Six Siege	31 44.4
2014	Civilization: Beyond Earth	40 57.7
2014	Dragon Age: Inquisition	21 30.8
2014	Far Cry 4	26 37.6
2014	GRID Autosport	37 54.2
2014	Shadow of Mordor	29 42.0
2014	The Talos Principle	33 48.4
2013	Crysis 3	16 23.3
2013	Battlefield 4	31 44.9
2012	Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	109 156.6
2009	League of Legends	60 87.0

R9 Nano with i7-4790K at 1080p and 超级品质 settings

R9 Nano with i7-4790K at 1440p and 超级品质 settings

R9 Nano with i7-4790K at 4K and 超级品质 settings

与竞争对手比较

AMD Radeon RX 590
2018 8GB ¥ 1,483
13% faster

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
2017 8GB ¥ 3,486
35% faster

Compare

AMD Radeon RX 570
2017 4GB ¥ 852
17% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon RX 580
2017 8GB ¥ 1,046
1% faster

Compare

AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
2017 8GB ¥ 1,864
30% faster

Compare

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
2017 8GB ¥ 2,904
36% faster

Compare

AMD Radeon RX 470
2016 4GB ¥ 2,370
29% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon RX 480
2016 8GB ¥ 2,765
17% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
2016 4GB ¥ 894
57% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
2016 8GB ¥ 2,280
27% faster

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
2016 6GB ¥ 1,102
0% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
2016 3GB ¥ 1,178
11% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
2015 2GB ¥ 617
0% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
2015 12GB ¥ 7,616
32% faster

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
2015 6GB ¥ 4,290
17% faster

Compare

AMD Radeon R9 380X
2015 4GB ¥ 1,587
47% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon R9 380
2015 2GB ¥ 2,072
57% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon R9 390
2015 8GB ¥ 3,223
17% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon R9 390X
2015 8GB ¥ 3,430
10% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon R9 FURY
2015 4GB ¥ 3,805
0% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
2015 4GB ¥ 4,498
0% faster

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
2014 6GB ¥ 6,923
0% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
2014 4GB ¥ 1,726
4% faster

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
2014 4GB ¥ 3,112
13% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon R9 280
2014 3GB ¥ 2,426
59% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon R9 285
2014 2GB ¥ 2,633
57% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon R9 295X2
2014 4GB ¥ 10,388
35% faster

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
2013 2GB ¥ 2,218
63% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
2013 3GB ¥ 2,841
16% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
2013 6GB ¥ 4,505
5% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
2013 3GB ¥ 2,460
24% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
2013 2GB ¥ 1,241
50% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon HD 7990
2013 3GB ¥ 6,923
4% faster

Compare

AMD Radeon R9 290
2013 4GB ¥ 2,148
21% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon R9 280X
2013 3GB ¥ 2,426
42% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon R9 290X
2013 4GB ¥ 2,765
15% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
2012 2GB ¥ 2,072
48% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
2012 2GB ¥ 548
37% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
2012 2GB ¥ 3,361
32% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
2012 2GB ¥ 3,042
10% faster

Compare

AMD Radeon HD 7950
2012 3GB ¥ 1,033
47% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition
2012 3GB ¥ 2,072
18% slower

Compare

R9 Nano 规格

R9 Nano Board Design

Board Number	C882
Length	6 inches 152 mm
Outputs	1x HDMI3x DisplayPort
Power Connectors	1x 8-pin
Slot Width	Dual-slot
TDP	175 W

R9 Nano Clock Speeds

GPU Clock	1000 MHz
Memory Clock	500 MHz 1000 MHz effective

R9 Nano Graphics Card

Bus Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16
Generation	Pirate Islands (R9 300)
Launch Price	649 USD
Production	Active
Release Date	Aug 27th, 2015

R9 Nano Graphics Features

DirectX	12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL	2
OpenGL	4.5
Shader Model	6
Vulkan	1.1.82

R9 Nano Graphics Processor

Architecture	GCN 3.0
Die Size	596 mm²
GPU Name	Fiji
GPU Variant	Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
Process Size	28 nm
Transistors	8,900 million

R9 Nano Memory

Bandwidth	512.0 GB/s
Memory Bus	4096 bit
Memory Size	4096 MB
Memory Type	HBM

R9 Nano Render Config

Compute Units	64
ROPs	64
Shading Units	4096
TMUs	256

R9 Nano Theoretical Performance

FP16 (half) performance	8,192 GFLOPS (1:1)
FP32 (float) performance	8,192 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance	512.0 GFLOPS (1:16)
Pixel Rate	64.00 GPixel/s
Texture Rate	256.0 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews

The AMD Radeon R9 Nano shows that you don’t always have to be the fastest to win the race. Some races are more of a marathon, and it’s more important to pace yourself well. MORE: Best Graphics ...

The Radeon R9 Nano is the fruition of AMD's gamble of integrating stacked high-bandwidth memory (HBM) and a 4,096 SP pixel-grinder into a compact multi-chip module that eliminates the need for external memory chips, freeing up large swathes of PCB area.

The new Radeon R9 Nano is the little brother to the existing AMD Radeon R9 Fury cards – in water-cooled 'X' and air-cooled standard models – and deserves that distinction in more ways than one.

AMD seems to have hit all the cues it set out to with the Radeon R9 Nano. This card is ridiculously tiny in light of other high-end GPUs, its power consumption characteristics are significantly ...

AMD's R9 Nano is a graphics card that serves its (very) niche high-end small form factor market well but its premium pricing makes it unaffordable to many small form factor system builders, and ...

AMD's R9 Nano is a hell of a little graphics card, delivering near-R9 Fury X performance in a compact mini-ITX form-factor. It's also expensive—very expensive—at $650, matching the price of ...

The AMD Radeon R9 Fury Nano is one of the most exciting graphics cards I’ve seen for years and, at only 6in long, it’s also one of the smallest. ... Verdict. AMD’s latest card is one of its ...

While AMD is pegging the Radeon R9 Nano as a luxury card, a component that isn't meant to be about value for money, rather it's all about getting the maximum performance for a small form factor PC ...

With the Radeon R9 Nano at the heart of our test rig, it consumed over 90 fewer watts than the Fury X--AMD's specified power ratings are in-line with our testing.

AMD Radeon R9 Nano Overclocking Results Extra performance with the R9 Nano comes in two distinct areas, overclocking and power management. Interestingly, AMD lets users unlock the power management ...

The R9 Nano is stunningly powerful given its Mini-ITX-friendly form factor, and a true leap ahead for AMD. Just know that this is a specialized component meant for very tight, compact PCs, and ...

As it turns out, AMD's Radeon R9 Nano is a great piece of hardware; there's really nothing like it out there. That’s probably why AMD is setting its price at an eye-popping $649. A lack of ...

The Radeon R9 Nano is AMD's solution for all small-form-factor system builders that want to create a 4K-capable gaming PC in a tiny volume. Thanks to a new approach to power management, the card stays below 200 W at all times, while still delivering excellent framerates.

AMD Radeon R9 Nano - the Digital Foundry verdict The R9 Nano packs an unprecedented amount of rendering power into an absolutely tiny product, and possesses superb build quality.

AMD deserves some serious props for even creating the Radeon R9 Nano in the first place. This pint-sized powerhouse is the latest in a long line of AMD technical innovations that skate to where ...

We’ll have a full suite of Radeon R9 Nano benchmarks recorded in our ultra-high-end graphics test-bed, along with comparison numbers from an array of other high-end GPUs, a little later.

AMD’s itty-bitty Radeon R9 Nano isn’t due to launch until September 10, but a review unit landed on my doorstep today. Sadly, I can’t talk about its performance until then, but an AMD ...

The Radeon R9 Nano is a high-end graphics card by AMD, launched in August 2015. Built on the 28 nm process, and based on the Fiji graphics processor, in its Fiji XT CA variant, the card supports DirectX 12.0.

The AMD Radeon R9 Nano finished just behind the Radeon R9 Fury here, but well ahead of the R9 390 or similarly-sized GeForce GTX 970 mini (the Asus GeForce GTX 970 Direct-CU mini to be exact).

As it turns out, AMD's Radeon R9 Nano is a great piece of hardware; there's really nothing like it out there. That’s probably why AMD is setting its price at an eye-popping $649.

Meanwhile at the other end of the spectrum is the Radeon R9 Nano, which sees AMD push the limits on miniaturization and pack Fiji into a card just 6 inches long.