RX Vega 56 dengan i7-7700K benchmark di Kualitas ultra pengaturan kualitas
Jelas bahwa RX Vega 56 secara signifikan lebih mampu high-end kartu yang dapat bermain AAA judul di 1080 p/1440 p dengan 50-60 frame per detik. It's worth dicatat bahwa RX Vega 56 adalah kartu sangat kuasa lapar dan membutuhkan kabel listrik layak. Dalam memori, RX Vega 56 's 8192 MB RAM lebih dari cukup untuk modern permainan dan tidak akan menyebabkan kemacetan yang ada. Singkatnya kinerja luar biasa, tidak ada pertanyaan bahwa ini adalah salah satu paling kuat satu GPU luar sana di 2026 .
The release year of the graphics card. The newer the better technology and performance optimization and
driver support.
Year
2016
2019
13
2015
2016
11
2014
2015
8
2013
2014
4
2007
2013
2
The price of the graphics card. The cheaper the better.
Price
0
250
35
250
400
30
400
550
25
550
650
15
650
9999
5
Power Supply Wattage required for overall system. The lower the better.
PSU
0
350
4
350
450
4
450
550
3
550
650
2
650
9999
1
Maximum recorded temperature under load. The lower the better for longer life of the graphics card.
Temp
0
70
2
70
75
2
75
80
1
80
85
1
85
999
1
Noise Levels under load. The lower the better.
Noise
0
45
2
45
48
2
48
50
2
50
55
1
55
999
1
Full HD performance at 1080p resolution. The higher the better.
FHD
60
9999
18
55
60
13
45
55
11
35
45
7
0
35
5
Quad HD performance at 1440p resolution. The higher the better.
QHD
60
9999
10
55
60
8
45
55
5
35
45
4
0
35
2
4K performance at 2160p resolution. The higher the better.
F4K
60
9999
5
55
60
4
45
55
3
35
45
2
0
35
1
Current CPU Impact on performance with respect to the highest performing CPU used for benchmark at the
time this graphics card was released.
CPU
-5
9999
5
-7
-5
4
-10
-7
3
-15
-10
2
-9999
-15
1
Graphics card memory (RAM) capacity. The higher the better for higher resolution textures and future
demanding games.
MEM
8
9999
5
4
8
4
2
4
3
1
2
2
0
1
1
FROM
TO
VERDICT
The overall score is determined based on the calculated weightings for the individual components.
OVERALL SCORE
80
99
Excellent
70
80
Very Good
60
70
Good
40
60
Acceptable
0
40
Weak
81/100
Sangat baik
RX Vega 64 mungkin menjadi flagship high-end dari set GCN 5.0 kartu grafis terbaru, tetapi harganya membuat mereka jauh dari jangkauan sebagian besar mid-range gamer PC. Di sisi lain, RX Vega 56 lebih dekat untuk terjangkau dengan label ₨ 5817559.7. AMD 's xx56 kartu selalu ditentukan oleh harga mid-range dengan kinerja yang mengetuk pintu high-end kartu grafis - terutama ketika overclock. Setelah meluangkan waktu untuk menguji sepenuhnya kartu grafis GCN 5.0 di dalam RX Vega 56, kita dapat mengatakan tanpa ragu bahwa itu melanjutkan tren.
Dibandingkan dengan saingan terdekat NVIDIA, GTX 1070 Ti, RX Vega 56 adalah -5.1 % lebih lambat. Untuk 1080p Full HD, kami dapat memainkan Baldur's Gate 3, Armored Core VI, Borderlands 3, F1 22, Anthem di 62 fps hingga 68 fps dan menjaga frame rate tetap di sekitar 64 fps.
Untuk 1440p Quad HD, kami dapat memainkan Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War, GreedFall, Death Stranding, Spider-Man Remastered, F1 2019 di 61 fps hingga 70 fps dan menjaga frame rate tetap di sekitar 67 fps. Untuk 2160p 4K, kami dapat memainkan Overwatch 2, Valorant di 67 fps hingga 141 fps dan menjaga frame rate tetap di sekitar 104 fps.
RX Vega 56 berada di antara GTX 1070 Ti dan GTX 1660 Ti , jatuh lebih lambat dari GTX 1070 Ti oleh 2.4 % dan lebih cepat dari GTX 1660 Ti oleh 1.6 %. Ini memiliki kinerja relatif rata-rata terhadap setiap kartu grafis di sini. Hasilnya sebenarnya tidak bisa dibedakan dengan hasil dari GTX 1070 Ti . Ini adalah panggilan dekat antara RX Vega 56 dan rivalnya GTX 1070 Ti dengan selisih kecil.
RX Vega 56 berada di antara RX Vega 64 dan GTX 1660 , jatuh lebih lambat dari RX Vega 64 oleh 2.2 % dan lebih cepat dari GTX 1660 oleh 1.4 %. Ini memiliki kinerja relatif rata-rata terhadap setiap kartu grafis di sini. Hasilnya sebenarnya tidak bisa dibedakan dengan hasil dari RX Vega 64 . Terhadap saingannya - GTX 1070 Ti , RX Vega 56 jauh lebih lambat.
RX Vega 56 berada di antara GTX 1070 Ti dan GTX 1660 Ti , jatuh lebih lambat dari GTX 1070 Ti oleh 2.4 % dan lebih cepat dari GTX 1660 Ti oleh 1.6 %. Ini memiliki kinerja relatif rata-rata terhadap setiap kartu grafis di sini. Hasilnya sebenarnya tidak bisa dibedakan dengan hasil dari GTX 1070 Ti . Ini adalah panggilan dekat antara RX Vega 56 dan rivalnya GTX 1070 Ti dengan selisih kecil.
RX Vega 56 berada di antara GTX 1660 dan GTX 1650 SUPER , jatuh lebih lambat dari GTX 1660 oleh 0.1 % dan lebih cepat dari GTX 1650 SUPER oleh 22.4 %. Ini memiliki kinerja relatif rata-rata terhadap setiap kartu grafis di sini. Hasilnya sebenarnya tidak bisa dibedakan dengan hasil dari GTX 1660 . Terhadap saingannya - GTX 1070 Ti , RX Vega 56 jauh lebih lambat.
RX Vega 56 berada di antara GTX 1070 Ti dan GTX 1660 Ti , jatuh lebih lambat dari GTX 1070 Ti oleh 2.5 % dan lebih cepat dari GTX 1660 Ti oleh 1.6 %. Ini memiliki kinerja relatif rata-rata terhadap setiap kartu grafis di sini. Hasilnya sebenarnya tidak bisa dibedakan dengan hasil dari GTX 1070 Ti . Mereka yang memiliki monitor dengan kecepatan refresh tinggi akan menikmati apa yang ditawarkan RX Vega 56 karena rata 120.5 rata 120.5 fps. Ini adalah panggilan dekat antara RX Vega 56 dan rivalnya GTX 1070 Ti dengan selisih kecil.
• See the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 at Best Buy The Verdict If this were two separate reviews the Vega 56 would get a higher score than the Vega 64, but since it's one review I'm labeling both of ...
Conclusion. Radeon RX Vega 56 is a close derivative of Vega 64, so its behaviors largely carry over from AMD’s flagship. The company does cut this card’s board power rating by almost 30% ...
Years in development, the new Radeon RX Vega line is finally arriving - AMD's return to the higher-end of GPU performance after concentrating its efforts more on the mainstream and budget sectors ...
Similar to AMD's Radeon RX Vega 64, the Vega 56 offers two BIOSes with corresponding power profiles that can be selected using a switch on the card. If you don't change the driver-based profiles ...
Perhaps the most telling comparison, however, is that despite the 20 percent price reduction compared to the RX Vega 64, the RX Vega 56 is slower by less than 10 percent on average.
Radeon RX Vega 56 is the second AMD Vega card launched today. It comes at an affordable $399 price point, with a slightly reduced shader count that actually improves things greatly. For example, power efficiency now trades blows with some Pascal cards, which means less heat and noise, too.
On the AMD side of things, it is the AMD Radeon RX 480, or that card's successors, the Radeon RX 580 and Radeon RX 570. Therefore, the Vega 56 should be more than adequate for today's VR ...
Conclusion (RX Vega 56) The Radeon RX Vega 56 is easily the best card of this launch. It is cooler, quieter, and more efficient than the Radeon RX Vega 64 and delivers only 10 percent less ...
The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 is the little sister of Vega 64. It comes in at a 20% lower price than the RX Vega 64, but only has 12.5% fewer stream processors, and runs lower operating frequencies.
Meet Radeon RX Vega 56 and RX Vega 64 Brad Chacos/IDG AMD sent PCWorld every version of Vega for testing, including both the air-cooled and liquid-cooled versions of the Radeon RX Vega 64.
The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 is an upper mid-range graphics card, intended to beat Nvidia's GeForce GTX 1070 - a job it performs admirably as the benchmarks on this page demonstrate.
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 - the Digital Foundry verdict. If you're looking for an alternative to the GTX 1070, the bottom line is that you're generally getting around 10 to 12 per cent of additional ...
The Radeon RX Vega 56 is a high-end graphics card by AMD, launched in August 2017. Built on the 14 nm process, and based on the Vega 10 graphics processor, in its Vega 10 XL variant, the card supports DirectX 12.0.
Launching today is the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, or just Vega 64 for short. Based on a fully enabled Vega 10 GPU, the Vega 64 will come in two physical variants: air cooled and liquid cooled.
Radeon RX Vega 56 utilizes the same Vega 10 processor found in Vega 64. It’s a 486 mm² behemoth sporting 12.5 billion transistors manufactured on GlobalFoundries’ 14LPP platform.
Vega 56 vs GTX 1070, Vega goes 6-2-2 = Winner Vega! Good job AMD, hopefully next gen you can make more headway in power efficiency. But this is a good card, even beats the factory OC 1070.
The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 and Vega 64 preview. ... so thanks AMD! RX Vega vs. the World: a 15-round heavyweight battle ... The RX Vega 56 is the more compelling choice, given the lower price and ...
Rx580 or vega 56 or gtx 1070I will buy a new gaming pc in march with a ryzen 7 2700, but i dont know which graphics card should i buy. In my country i can get the rx 580 around 120k ft, the vega 56 around 185k ft, and a gtx 1070 about 150-160k ft. Which should I buy? I already have my monitor, it supports freesync. (75hz, 1080x2560 resolution)
00
C
compeltindows7 years ago
If you want to use freesync you would have to go for either of the amd cards. you could get a vega 56 but its a pricey and can draw quite a lot of power than a 1070, which give almost similar performance which run much cooler with a third party cooler. So you would be good with the gtx 1070 and save some bucks for some of performance and there are cases where the gtx 1070 outperforms the vega 56,and you could overclock it to get vega like performance but or if that isn't the case you don't mind the extra power draw and heat, and want to make use of the free sync you can surely go for the vega 56. The rx 580 doesn't come anywhere these two so it is out if the question.Check this link out for comparison of two cards at stock and overclocked- http://blog.logicalincrements.com/2017/08/rx-vega-56-vs-gtx-1070-gtx-1080/
10
U
unsubtlerapadash7 years ago
Should I buy the RX Vega 56 over the GTX 1070?I'll be building a new rig in a few weeks. For a few days, I've been having trouble deciding on which graphics card I want to get. For a while, I was decided that I'd go with the 1070, but then I realized that Vega 56 performs just as well or better while offering Freesync, which my monitor does offer. For some reason, I still can't decide whether or not I should go for the Vega 56. Should I?
00
V
vireodrove7 years ago
On much smaller case blower type cooler is better due to heat being dump outside the case directly. But on much bigger case "open air" cooler usually end up being better. Also noise. Those blower type cooler can be very loud when the fan speed start ramping up.
Apa yang Perlu Dipertimbangkan Sebelum Membeli Kartu Grafis
Jika Anda telah berencana untuk meningkatkan sistem Anda dengan membeli kartu grafis baru. Lalu ada beberapa faktor penting untuk dipertimbangkan.
Resolusi VS Kualitas: Dampak pada Kinerja Game
Apa yang memengaruhi kinerja game? Kejelasan atau Detail?
Pengaturan Kualitas Tinggi Ultra VS di Game PC
Setiap pemain memiliki gagasan berbeda tentang pengaturan ideal untuk game PC. Tetapi dalam kebanyakan kasus, memilih untuk konfigurasi grafis berkualitas tinggi adalah cara untuk pergi.
Apa yang dimaksud dengan bottleneck CPU atau GPU?
Apakah Anda mendapatkan tetes bingkai mendadak? Anda mungkin mengalami hambatan.
Berapa kecepatan FPS yang bisa saya terima?
Untuk beberapa gim, Anda masih bisa menikmati garphics hebat dengan frame rate lebih rendah.
GPU Hierarchy
GPU Compare
CPU Compare
Gaming Laptops
Gaming Monitors
Gaming Headsets
Diskusi dan Komentar
Bagikan Komentar Anda